Browsing in News
Yesterday Postmaster General John Potter unveiled a controversial plan to save the Postal Service by cutting the number of post offices and dropping Saturday delivery.  I think those are both great ideas to address how people use the mail system now, but they aren’t thinking forward enough.
First off they need to address the fact that people aren’t sending as much through the mail any more since they can do everything electronically. On August 6, 2009 Potter spoke to Congress about the state of the USPS and in his prepared remarks of 8,035 words he never said “email” “electronic” or even “computer”.  (Though he did discuss budget issues and employee benefit costs to which I have no insight.)
Of course, the people on the front line know what’s going on.  NPR interviewed Daniel Jones the postmaster of Asheville, North Carolina to get his opinion on the proposal and how the post office has changed through time.  He cuts right to the point and points to a decline in the volume of mail sent which can be instead done through the internet.  People send emails instead of letters but also bank online which eliminates the statement mailed from the bank, bills sent from a third party and a check mailed back.
And while those might be bad for the USPS, they’re great for everyone else.  In addition to banking online being more convenient, it’s so much better for the environment.  We use less paper and don’t have the carbon footprint of mail trucks and planes sending an slip of paper across the country.  The USPS is actively refusing to Go Green.  Which isn’t surprising since it will cost them their jobs.  But here’s the thing about that, if someone’s job only exists to give that person a job, then it’s unnecessary.  This isn’t the nicest thing to say while we’re in a recession, but lots of other people have had jobs that were rendered obsolete over the course of human history.  Today NPR even put together a slideshow of jobs society decided it didn’t need any more.  And while NPR didn’t say this was in reference to postal carriers, I think it’s pretty clear where their inspiration came from.
The big defense of the Post Office is that “it’s part of the community” and a “place to meet and locate, you know, to congregate, to get together and talk”.  This is simply a lie.  I live in a moderately sized city now and I’ve lived in a small town and I’ve been to smaller towns and I can categorically say that no one goes to the Post Office to hang out.  No one decides to go to the Post Office to see what the word on the street is.  Anyone at the Post Office is just counting the seconds until they can leave the Post Office after standing in that DMV-like line, talking with the unorganized and unprofessional person behind the counter and waiting for them to dig around in the back room for whatever it is that they came in for.
The Post Office is not a pleasant experience.  And what’s more, we’ve seen it done better.  FedEx and UPS are both superior systems that offer better tracking and customer service, but it’s comes with a higher price tag.  Is there a middle ground? Yes, we just have to look to the dry cleaners.
Automated dry cleaners are the wave of the future.  With these systems people drop off their clothes with a machine and get a ticket they return later and give the machine back their ticket and after paying the clothes are returned.  It’s quicker, easier and cheaper and available around the clock.  Some of these are even drive-throughs.
So how does the Post Office adopt this?  Here’s the journey of mail in the future:
My mom wants to mail a package to me, she goes online and fills out the information, a label prints out which she puts on the box.  At the same time I get an email that a package is on its way to me. The next time she goes to the now fully automated Post Office she inserts the box into its bin, the barcode is scanned and the pack is identified.  The mail travels to my local Post Office and I get an email that it has arrived.  I stop by the Post Office on my way home from work and wave my ID card (or fob or phone or whatever) at the sensor, a bin opens up and I collect my email and my mom gets an email I’ve picked up the package.
It’s a quick and painless operation for both my mom and me that works on our schedule.  The costs are low because there are the fewest people necessary involved and the infrastructure costs are divided among the many users.
That’s a better mail system for everyone involved and I came up with it after a single day of thinking about it.  It doesn’t even require new technology to be developed, just properly applied. Let’s stop thinking about how to save jobs we’ve evolved past and start thinking about how to make the world work better for us all.
Let the post office die. We can rebuild it-we have the technology.

I’ve always been annoyed to hear people talk about “how celebrities die in groups of three.”

Over five days we lost Robert Mulligan, Harold Pinter, and Eartha Kitt. Which are all great losses but is it a frightening phenomenon that they all die around the same time? Does the death of one famous person mean everyone else should be nervous?

No. One celebrity are likely to die around the same time as two other celebrities simply because there are so many of them now.

Andy Warhol said it best, “In the future everyone will be famous for 15 minutes.” There is a constant parade of new artists, writers, actors, musicians, athletes, politicians, reporters, and people who are famous for no reason (people on YouTube, Joe The Plumber, anyone from a reality show, anyone from an MTV reality show) who add to the old classic famous people.
So not only do we have new famous people coming up every day, but now our old famous people are Old! Mulligan was 83, Pinter was 78 and Kitt was 81. As harsh it may sound it’s not uncommon for people in their 80s to die.

So now we have too many celebrities and too many old celebrities. It just makes sense that there would be a steady stream of dying celebrities that observers can group into threes.

Just a few notes on things I was thinking about that should be revisited…

continue reading "A Few Follow-ups"

What a day yesterday was.

Obviously I’m thrilled about Barack.  I’ve been wanted him to be president since his speech  at the 2004 DNC.  And what’s impressive, is that the message he delivered then, is the same thing he promised during his campaign and I am supremely confident that he will deliver.  It was a thrill to hear him speak last night in a wonderful speech that managed to encompass his campaign ideals, the history and founding ideals of America and the grand expectations and forward thinking to carry us into the future, what ever that may be.

Also I enjoyed John McCain’s speech.  He sounded like he did in 2000, which was a welcome regression.  As we stand here and look forward to the future we have a lot to do and I believe we can do it.  Barack will need a First Hundred Days akin to FDR and he’s getting ready.  His transition teams are moving amongst the government now and he’s constructing his staff. How’s that for Ready on day one?

And I wouldn’t be surprised if the Lincoln parallels ccontinue and we see another Team of Rivals.  But hopefully Karen Sebelius gets in there too.

But the triumph of Barack (which I figured was a given in the morning)  came with the sting of prejudice and hate in the form of Prop 8. A truly horrific bill that shamefully appears to have snuck through and passed as of now.  Things could change but it’s doubtful as they count more ballots we’ll find a stack of NOs.  But this afternoon when I stopped by the Supreme Court I was told that 3 different groups are trying to over turn 8, each with a different strategy.

So while we’re moving forward in one way, we’re still dragging in another.  But the fight isn’t over.

And here are a few smaller things that I was watching…


continue reading "It’s morning again in America"

Today, right now is the election.  I voted early and had a little line, but nothing to complain about.

I have a great feeling that Obama will win.  It’s tremendous.  But I’m nervous that Prop 8 might.  Let’s hope people aren’t so evil and foolish as to pass it.

Today is being called “the most important election of our lifetimes.”  And that could be true.  But I don’t think we’ll know until in the future looking back.  Because 2000’s feels pretty danged important.  Though comparing the two elections, this one has much more a build up and Obama will represent much more of a change and a follow through on everything America represents.

But hopefully his presidency will be more important than Bush’s and will leave more of a lasting mark.  In fact, if Obama can simply undo what Bush has done, that will be enough and 2008 will be the most important election.